In my job, I am confronted almost daily with the need for common sense when we approach attendance. The idea of attendance in an online school is a completely foreign concept for most people, and it was for me until several years ago when I jumped into teaching at an online school. While at Wolf Creek Online High School, I participated in the development of attendance policies for the online world.
As I have worked in this now for several years, I have refined my thinking, have shared the concept around the state of Minnesota and in other states (most recently in Michigan – so fun!!!), and have started to think outside of the online world and into the seat-based world.
School attendance is important, but we often go too far and lack common sense in our application of this value. As one can conclude from the graphic to the left, I firmly believe in a correlation between school attendance and students passing their classes which eventually leads to graduation. As this is the ultimate goal that schools presumably have for all of their students, it follows easily, then, that school attendance should be expected from all students. But notice that, in addition to attendance, access to curriculum is also part of the pyramid. This is there because of my use of this pyramid in the online world. Accessing curriculum is attendance in the online world.
But it is not in the seat-based world.
My latest and greatest question is this: WHY NOT?
With more and more schools using course management systems such as Moodle, BlackBoard, or Desire2Learn in order to house curriculum, lessons, and videos, accessing curriculum (which used to equate to the butt-in-seat of classroom) now can be done from a sick student’s bedroom while the student recovers from pneumonia. This completely destroys the concept of seat-based attendance because accessing the curriculum is no longer dependent upon the student being in the classroom.
As options expand for accessing the curriculum, our definition of attendance and truancy will need to change.
And it should.
And when it does, horrible grievances against students will be avoided.
Within the past year, I have jumped into the Twitter world (mostly due to being able to disseminate my blog posts). In that same time, I also read Think by Lisa Bloom and then followed her on Facebook and Twitter. While she and I would likely disagree on some things (and we would both be ok with that as long as our stances can be clearly thought out and defended), she and I do agree on many things such as the need for literacy, the need for an emphasis on education, and the need for many to start thinking!
Last night, she shared a link on her Twitter-feed that sent me through the roof!
Click here to watch and read the news story about Diane Tran, the 11th grade honor student who was sent to jail for missing too much time in class. Instead of dropping out to support herself when faced with a difficult situation, Tran chose to stay in school while also working a full-time job.
There are many questions that I have about this situation:
Why is she supporting herself and two siblings?
Why are her parents not involved?
Why has no school social worker intervened and kept this student from going to court?
Why has no one talked to this student about taking an online class instead of the first hour class that she often misses due to her life’s schedule?
Why is she still getting good grades when she misses so much class?
There are solutions to the issue that did not need to involve the student paying a fine, going to jail, or even going to court! The courts should be used when students and families are not able to cooperate with the school in a reasonable fashion. They should not be used to punish honor students who are doing just fine in their classes even when they miss the classes.
I have said and will continue to say it: our system needs an overhaul to get it caught up with the times. Our laws are still based on the education system of fifty years ago when schools did not even have fax machines. The last revision of the truancy laws in Texas occurred in 2003; two years later, the Texas legislature passed the law allowing for virtual schools. Like most other states across the nation, these two lines of thinking did not intersect.
But they need to do so.
Moving all of our schools to progress-based attendance will solve issues like that of the case of Diane Than. She is but one student who has been caught in the cross-fire of attendance and truancy laws being outdated and poorly applied. The intent of these laws are to engage all students in learning which would lead to successful lives. When we lose of the intent of laws in the midst of applying them without common sense, we do the students of our nation a disservice.
This is why I do what I do. I want to see these laws applied correctly to the students and families who need them. And I want to see students and families to whom these laws no longer apply be freed from the shackles of old thinking.
What do you think?